
![]() |
||
A quarterly magazine of urban affairs, published by the Manhattan Institute, edited by Brian C. Anderson.
• • • • • • • • • ![]() |
Selected Responses: Sent by Timothy Birdnow on 02-01-2009: Many, many people change their political beliefs, including David Horowitz and David Mamet. There may be a genetic component contributing to certain neurological differences between conservatives and liberals (cognitive neuropsychologist John Ray thinks so), but the many people who have switched their views suggest that such a genetic component is secondary to education and life experience. Sent by Jeff Perren on 02-01-2009: The article's basic thesis is in error and depends on a false alternative between nature and nurture, as if no third alternative exists. Sent by Brad O on 01-30-2009: Interesting line of thought and investigation. So does that mean if I'm relatively happy with local politics that I should be for limiting immigration to prevent "mucking up" the local gene pool? I am sure someone is already well on their way to formulating new political strategies based on this information. Sent by Geoffrey Faust on 01-30-2009: Good article, but the comment about why people vote shows one of the ideological limitations of social scientistic thinking: inability to recognize deontological drives and contexts. People stand in line to vote because they see it as their duty; you have to think about the fireman rushing into the burning building to understand this. A homo economicus analysis will always make unegoistic behavior appear irrational. |
More by James Q. Wilson:
If you liked this story, you may also be interested in:
|
|
|
||